Ryan Peniston vs Shunsuke Nakagawa Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 05 Nov at 08:41 PM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
R. Peniston vs S. Nakagawa

GBR
1
Win
Played
0
Win

JPN
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Peniston 1 - 0 Nakagawa
They have played 3 sets in total, with Ryan Peniston winning 2 and Shunsuke Nakagawa winning 1. The last match between Ryan Peniston and Shunsuke Nakagawa was at the Matsuyama Challenger, 06-11-2025, Round: R2, Surface: Hard, with Ryan Peniston getting the victory 6-2 6-7(5) 6-3.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Peniston | 1 |
| Nakagawa | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R2) Matsuyama Challenger(11-06-25)
R. Peniston vs S. Nakagawa H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $263,350 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 61.66% (365-227) | Career Total W/L | 60.71% (68-44) |
| 1 | Hard | 0 |
| 10 | Titles | 0 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
R. Peniston vs S. Nakagawa Match Preview:
- Second serve performance highlights a slight edge for Ryan Peniston, winning 42.20% of points versus Shunsuke Nakagawa's 40.82% over the last six months. Does this statistic give Peniston a competitive advantage?
- Return game analysis demonstrates Peniston’s superior ability to win return points on the opponent’s second serves, standing at 48.28% compared to Nakagawa’s 45.53%.
- In terms of first serve returns, Nakagawa wins a slightly higher percentage (29.22%) than Peniston (28.92%), suggesting a minimal advantage here.
- Handling pressure, Peniston is more efficient at saving breakpoints, with a success rate of 52.24%, compared to Nakagawa's 48.91%.
- Overall match performance in the past year favors Peniston, who has won 72.22% of his matches, compared to Nakagawa's 65.38%.
- Both players excel on hard courts, each with a 62% win rate, but their least favored surfaces differ, with Nakagawa struggling more on clay and Peniston on grass.
- Peniston's recent tournament performance is stronger, winning 81.25% of his Futures/Satellites/ITF $10K matches, over Nakagawa’s 65.96%.
- Ryan Peniston has faced slightly higher-ranked opponents (average rank of 394.11) than Shunsuke Nakagawa (average rank of 427) over the last 12 months, potentially honing his competitive edge.
- If a deciding set occurs, Peniston has a notable advantage, winning 71% of such sets in the past year, compared to Nakagawa’s 60% win rate.
- Assessing current event stats could offer additional insight, factoring in how players perform at specific events.
Editorial Prediction (November 5, 2025, UTC):
As we approach this matchup, Ryan Peniston seems to have a slight edge based on multiple performance metrics. His second serve success, ability to break opponents' second serves, and superior breakpoint resilience create a formidable profile.
The overall win percentage in the past year and his strong performance against slightly higher-ranked opponents further support his candidacy as the favorite.
Although both players show equal proficiency on hard courts, Peniston's challenge against higher-ranked players and better deciding set win rate tips the scale in his favor.
Considering all available data, Ryan Peniston appears to be the most likely victor in this upcoming tennis match.
Ryan Peniston vs Shunsuke Nakagawa Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
R. Peniston vs S. Nakagawa H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 1 |
| 18 | Games Won | 12 |
| 4 | Aces (Total) | 4 |
| 5 | Total Double Faults | 2 |
| 2:18:51 | Average Match Time | 2:18:51 |
| 74% (68/92) | 1st Serve % | 66% (62/94) |
| 72% (49/68) | 1st Serve Win % | 61% (38/62) |
| 58% (14/24) | 2nd Serve Win % | 50% (16/32) |
| 42% (5/12) | Break Pts Won % | 29% (2/7) |
| 43% (40/94) | Return Points Win % | 32% (29/92) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
R. Peniston Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 | L | 6-2 6-7(4) 1-1 ret. | ||
SF | L | 6-3 6-2 | ||
QF | W | 7-5 3-6 6-2 | ||
R2 | W | 6-2 6-7(5) 6-3 | ||
R1 | W | 6-0 6-1 | ||
S. Nakagawa Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
R2 | L | 6-2 6-7(5) 6-3 | ||
R1 | W | 2-6 7-5 6-3 | ||
Q3 | W | 6-3 7-5 | ||
Q1 | W | 6-3 6-1 | ||
R2 | L | 6-3 6-7(4) 6-3 | ||

R. Peniston vs S. Nakagawa Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 61.66% (365/227) | YTD Win/Loss | 60.71% (68/44) |
| 59.58% (799/542) | Sets Win/Loss | 60.48% (150/98) |
| 54.56% (6719/5596) | Games Win/Loss | 53.27% (1246/1093) |
| 67.07% (220/108) | Hard Win/Loss | 61.32% (65/41) |
| 57.53% (42/31) | Clay Win/Loss | 50.00% (2/2) |
| 55.37% (67/54) | Indoor Hard W/L | 50.00% (1/1) |
| 51.43% (36/34) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.19 | Aces Per Game | 0.14 |
| 1143 | Aces Total | 161 |
| 0.22 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.1 |
| 1307 | Total Double Faults | 112 |
| 1:23:49 | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 430.41 | Average Opponent Rank | 350.24 |
| 62% (19622/31582) | 1st Serve % | 67% (2954/4402) |
| 68% (13261/19622) | 1st Serve Win % | 63% (1867/2954) |
| 51% (6071/11960) | 2nd Serve Win % | 48% (696/1448) |
| 43% (1640/3783) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 44% (217/491) |
| 43% (13938/32713) | Return Points Win % | 41% (1830/4424) |
| 25.00% (4/12) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.00% (0/1) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 41.18% (7/10) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 54.39% (124/104) | Challenger W/L | 33.33% (3/6) |
| 69.70% (230/100) | Futures W/L | 63.11% (65/38) |
| 62% (358/579) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 61% (68/111) |
| 40% (2/5) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 52% (67/130) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 73% (22/30) |
| 56% (90/161) | Deciding Set Win % | 44% (11/25) |
| 88% (361/319) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 91% (68/62) |
| 12% (361/42) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 9% (68/6) |
| 20% (231/47) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 14% (44/6) |